Bright = gay = humanist = fag?

See more » Gallimaufry

I think Richard Dawkins may overestimate how much the word gay itself has changed the lives of homosexual men. And he inhabits too rarified a world to have every heard a teenager say that's so gay!.

"Humanism" from the mouth of a Baptist preacher sounds like the worst thing in perversion (not that I believe in perversion) since Sodom and Gomorrah. Should bright catch on I'm sure their tongues will be equally adept at making 'bright' sound nasty.

Maybe I'm being too pessimistic. Perhaps some people will be able to call themselves brights who can't call themselves atheists. It'll take many more people with the prestige of Dawkins and Daniel Dennett to keep it from inspiring a giggle.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bright = gay = humanist = fag?:

» "New public relations strategy for the godless" from Gullibility isn't in the dictionary
Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary confirms my own doubts of the value of the Brights Movement: Daniel Dennett claims that atheism... [Read More]

» Blogging for The Brights from Gullibility isn't in the dictionary
From my referral logs I notice someone is checking Popdex for references to The Brights. Possibly a Brights Movement fan hoping to see it as... [Read More]

Your feelings?

Please share your feelings about Bright = gay = humanist = fag?.
Thanks,
Richard

More of My Blogs

Comments

Other Entries


Bookmark Pansexual Sodomite

  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Yahoo
  • Google
  • StumbleUpon


Pansexual Sodomite
Index
Gallimaufry
Bright = gay = humanist = fag?
Top of page